Skydive is a cloud-based AI agent platform built for teams that want AI to handle real work rather than simply answer questions. Instead of stopping at suggestions or requiring users to build detailed automation workflows, it lets teams describe an outcome and create an agent around that job.
Each agent gets its own cloud computer, browser, tools, and persistent memory. That means an agent can navigate websites, work with files, use business applications, run code, collect information, and complete tasks from beginning to end. For a busy team, this changes the role of AI from something you consult into something you can delegate work to.
The approach is particularly interesting for startups and growing teams where repetitive operational work can consume a surprising amount of time. Marketing, engineering, customer support, sales, operations, and executive work can all be handled by agents configured for specific roles.
The experience is designed around delegation rather than complicated automation diagrams. Instead of opening a large workflow canvas and manually connecting every step, users can describe what they want an agent to accomplish.
This makes the platform approachable for people who understand their business processes but do not want to spend their time designing automation logic. Agents can also be reached through familiar communication channels, including Slack, email, iMessage, and the web.
The interface becomes more useful as agents start working because users can review what happened, see which tools were used, and understand how a task progressed. For teams, that visibility can be more valuable than a simple chatbot conversation.
Performance is closely tied to the type of work being delegated. The platform is designed for multi-step tasks where an agent needs to browse, interact with software, process information, and deliver a finished result.
One notable advantage is persistent context. If an agent receives a correction about a company's preferred terminology, process, or working style, that information can be remembered and applied to future work. Over time, this can reduce the need to repeatedly explain the same instructions.
There is still an important reason to review agent activity, especially when an agent has permission to make changes in business systems. The ability to inspect actions and timelines gives teams a practical way to catch mistakes and refine how their agents work.
The platform goes beyond conventional chat-based assistance. An agent can use a real browser, work with files, navigate business applications, browse the web, and perform actions across connected systems.
For example, an operations agent could reconcile information from receipts and a shared spreadsheet. A marketing agent could examine advertising performance and prepare actions based on the results. An engineering agent can work with repositories, reproduce issues, interact with development tools, and help move fixes through the development process.
Multiple agents can also work as a team. A larger task can be divided between specialized roles, allowing one agent to investigate an issue while another handles a related part of the job.
Security is an important part of the platform because agents may interact with company accounts and sensitive business tools. Agents operate in isolated, single-tenant sandboxes, with access controlled at the network layer.
Credentials are stored in dedicated encrypted storage, while permissions can be configured for individual agents. Teams can make agents private, internal, or externally accessible depending on the intended audience.
Activity is also recorded through audit logs, giving teams visibility into agent and team-member actions. The platform states that it conducts regular third-party penetration testing and has completed a Cloud Application Security Assessment at Assurance Level 1.
Enterprise customers also receive additional governance options, including more advanced security controls, spend controls, model controls, audit capabilities, and deployment options.
Pros
Cons
The platform uses a subscription model combined with usage-based billing. The Starter plan begins at $20 per month and includes unlimited agents and up to five users, with AI model costs and compute charged according to actual usage without an additional markup.
The Team plan is listed at $200 per month and is aimed at teams that need greater usage capacity and priority support. Enterprise plans add advanced governance, security, audit, model and integration controls, along with options for organizations that require customized deployment or commercial arrangements.
Because model and compute usage can vary significantly depending on the work assigned to agents, teams should consider both the subscription price and expected agent activity when estimating their total cost.
Traditional chat assistants are excellent at answering questions and generating content, but they often leave the final action to the user. Workflow builders take a different approach by giving users precise control over every step, but that can require considerable setup.
This platform sits between those two approaches while pushing further toward autonomous execution. Users describe the desired outcome, and the agent determines how to carry out the work using its own computer and connected tools.
That distinction matters for teams dealing with messy, multi-step processes. Instead of designing a rigid automation for every possible situation, a team can give an agent a role, connect the necessary tools, and refine its behavior over time.
It is not necessarily a replacement for every automation platform or AI assistant. For simple repetitive triggers, a traditional workflow tool may still be easier. For questions that only require an answer, a conventional chatbot may be faster. The strongest fit is work that requires an AI worker to actually navigate systems and complete a result.
The most appealing part of this platform is its focus on finished work. It treats AI agents less like chat windows and more like digital coworkers that can operate inside the software a team already uses.
Persistent memory, scheduled routines, dedicated cloud computers, browser-based interaction, multi-agent collaboration, and activity visibility give the platform a practical foundation for delegating operational work. For a growing company, that can mean fewer repetitive tasks sitting on people's desks and more time available for decisions that genuinely require human judgment.
It is particularly compelling for teams that have already identified recurring work across marketing, engineering, sales, support, operations, or SEO. Instead of asking whether AI can provide another answer, the more useful question becomes whether an agent can take ownership of the task and return with the job completed.
It is a platform for creating AI agents that can perform real work inside the tools a team already uses. Agents can browse the web, interact with applications, process files, run code, and complete multi-step tasks.
Not in the traditional sense. While users can communicate with agents through familiar channels, the main purpose is delegation. Agents are designed to take actions and complete work rather than simply provide an answer.
Yes. Recurring tasks can be configured as routines, allowing agents to monitor situations, take actions, and report results on a schedule even after the user has closed their computer.
Yes. Teams can create multiple agents with different roles, and agents can hand work to one another for larger assignments.
Yes. The platform is designed around describing the desired outcome in plain language rather than requiring users to write code or manually construct complex workflow logic.
Agents can work with a wide range of business applications and services, including tools used for communication, engineering, project management, documents, spreadsheets, analytics, marketing, and customer support. Browser-based computer use also allows agents to interact with systems that may not have a dedicated integration.
Yes. Agents maintain persistent memory across interactions, allowing useful preferences, corrections, and context to carry forward into future work.
Starter begins at $20 per month, while Team is listed at $200 per month. Usage for AI models and compute is billed according to actual consumption, and Enterprise plans provide additional governance and security options.
The platform uses isolated agent sandboxes, encrypted credential storage, access controls, network-level restrictions, and audit logging. It also states that it performs regular penetration testing and has completed a CASA Assurance Level 1 assessment.
AI Workflow Management , AI SEO Assistant , AI Project Management , AI Productivity Tools .
These classifications represent its core capabilities and areas of application. For related tools, explore the linked categories above.